|
|
Post by quikdrummer on Nov 20, 2019 23:40:04 GMT -5
Lol Rachel Nichols isn’t fat And the second part is debatable Let me tell you something you pink bouncing punk, you will NEVER paint MY Rachel in a negative light again or I swear to GWAD imma finna be on the next thing smoking to arizona and we gonna get it popping!!! Now bend over and let me tr@pe you to make me feel better! You sure talk a lot, buttbuddy How about I meet you in Temecula? |
|
|
|
Post by mrShowtime on Nov 21, 2019 9:37:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mrShowtime on Nov 21, 2019 10:02:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by admiralfish on Nov 21, 2019 10:25:38 GMT -5
Let me tell you something you pink bouncing punk, you will NEVER paint MY Rachel in a negative light again or I swear to GWAD imma finna be on the next thing smoking to arizona and we gonna get it popping!!! Now bend over and let me tr@pe you to make me feel better! You sure talk a lot, buttbuddy How about I meet you in Temecula? WHAT?? Where the fakk is that? How about you just send me the trade ass and we can forget all about it? |
|
|
|
Post by mrShowtime on Nov 21, 2019 10:58:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by quikdrummer on Nov 21, 2019 11:05:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by admiralfish on Nov 21, 2019 13:01:17 GMT -5
I think everyone is looking at it wrong. Instead of comparing how about answering this: Would Jordan have been as dominant in today's game? I say no. |
|
|
|
Post by admiralfish on Nov 21, 2019 13:20:26 GMT -5
LoL! Yeah, it's not that serious. Not over sports disagreements. However, that dude is a troll and clearly an ass hole some trolls do go too far tho. Did you send an offer yet bish? |
|
|
|
Post by mrShowtime on Nov 21, 2019 13:36:46 GMT -5
I think everyone is looking at it wrong. Instead of comparing how about answering this: Would Jordan have been as dominant in today's game? I say no. In a game with less defense, bigger superstar calls, looser traveling rules, and the best trainers in the world? I'm not so sure that Jordan couldn't average 12 and 4 RIGHT NOW. |
|
|
|
Post by quikdrummer on Nov 21, 2019 13:44:06 GMT -5
LoL! Yeah, it's not that serious. Not over sports disagreements. However, that dude is a troll and clearly an ass hole some trolls do go too far tho. Did you send an offer yet bish? Sure did |
|
|
|
Post by bbills on Nov 21, 2019 16:19:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bbills on Nov 21, 2019 16:24:23 GMT -5
I think everyone is looking at it wrong. Instead of comparing how about answering this: Would Jordan have been as dominant in today's game? I say no. In a game with less defense, bigger superstar calls, looser traveling rules, and the best trainers in the world? I'm not so sure that Jordan couldn't average 12 and 4 RIGHT NOW. you dont think jordan wouldnt take advantage of less defense, looser traveling rules and the best trainers in the world himself? This aint quantum leap your not just shifting 90's jordan to today and expect to still have 90's jordan.. You would have Jordan come up in todays game and i think he would still dominate. Kobe was dominate in todays game and i feel Jordan would be bettter them him.. |
|
|
|
Post by bbills on Nov 21, 2019 16:26:24 GMT -5
hey pain why your ignoring the text chat? did you get cained and your phone privileges get taken away?
|
|
|
|
Post by mrShowtime on Nov 21, 2019 16:26:35 GMT -5
LOL!! Somebody needs to be fired.  |
|
|
|
Post by bbills on Nov 21, 2019 16:27:20 GMT -5
LOL!! Somebody needs to be fired.  broken pic |
|
|
|
Post by mrShowtime on Nov 21, 2019 16:35:36 GMT -5
In a game with less defense, bigger superstar calls, looser traveling rules, and the best trainers in the world? I'm not so sure that Jordan couldn't average 12 and 4 RIGHT NOW. you dont think jordan wouldnt take advantage of less defense, looser traveling rules and the best trainers in the world himself? This aint quantum leap your not just shifting 90's jordan to today and expect to still have 90's jordan.. You would have Jordan come up in todays game and i think he would still dominate. Kobe was dominate in todays game and i feel Jordan would be bettter them him.. My point was that 56yr old braided-belt and ripped jeans MJ could get 12 and 4 right now. 26yr old MJ who grew up watching AI, Kobe, and LeBron would be a DAMN MONSTER |
|
|
|
Post by bbills on Nov 21, 2019 16:38:02 GMT -5
you dont think jordan wouldnt take advantage of less defense, looser traveling rules and the best trainers in the world himself? This aint quantum leap your not just shifting 90's jordan to today and expect to still have 90's jordan.. You would have Jordan come up in todays game and i think he would still dominate. Kobe was dominate in todays game and i feel Jordan would be bettter them him.. My point was that 56yr old braided-belt and ripped jeans MJ could get 12 and 4 right now. 26yr old MJ who grew up watching AI, Kobe, and LeBron would be a DAMN MONSTER ohh my bad then we are in agreement and my point moves over to ridge |
|
|
|
Post by quikdrummer on Nov 21, 2019 17:01:50 GMT -5
LOL!! Somebody needs to be fired. Showtime how did they get your picture? |
|
|
|
Post by tadster00 on Nov 21, 2019 19:00:43 GMT -5
Lol Rachel Nichols isn’t fat And the second part is debatable Let me tell you something you pink bouncing punk, you will NEVER paint MY Rachel in a negative light again or I swear to GWAD imma finna be on the next thing smoking to arizona and we gonna get it popping!!! Now bend over and let me tr@pe you to make me feel better! Whogay? |
|
|
|
Post by admiralfish on Nov 22, 2019 0:09:22 GMT -5
Let me tell you something you pink bouncing punk, you will NEVER paint MY Rachel in a negative light again or I swear to GWAD imma finna be on the next thing smoking to arizona and we gonna get it popping!!! Now bend over and let me tr@pe you to make me feel better! Whogay? TIMMÁY! |
|
|
|
Post by admiralfish on Nov 22, 2019 0:16:25 GMT -5
This page is awesome, nice work snitches.
The key is Jordan today would NOT be the alpha athlete he was in that era.
These dudes are bigger, stronger and more coordinated (lol @ Paul George!) he just physically dominated his era.
Couldn't do that now.
Man it would be cool to see though.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrShowtime on Nov 22, 2019 7:33:05 GMT -5
This page is awesome, nice work snitches. The key is Jordan today would NOT be the alpha athlete he was in that era. These dudes are bigger, stronger and more coordinated (lol @ Paul George!) he just physically dominated his era. Couldn't do that now. Man it would be cool to see though. Now I think you may just be making stuff up for the sake of it. Jordan wasn't "physically dominant." The only physical part of his game was when he bulked up in the early 90s to combat the Jordan Rules. He only weighed about 210 lbs for most of his career. Plus, the game is SIGNIFICANTLY less physical now than it was then. PFs have gotten heavier and there are a few more point-forwards than their were in yester-year, but most of those guys plant themselves at 24ft and stay out of the middle. It's definitely more of a finesse game today than it used to be. You really think Devin Booker could get 25 per game in 1993? |
|
|
|
Post by mrShowtime on Nov 22, 2019 10:27:08 GMT -5
The Hornets are remaking the roster and they’ve gotten themselves pretty well stocked with young guards and wings in the process, plus Washington. But there’s still a glaring hole in the middle and as the Hornets are primed to finally be rid of some of the albatross contracts that have weighed the franchise since its last playoff appearance (in 2016). At long last, they are in position to fill that void.
The target, according to league sources: Pistons big man Andre Drummond, a player in whom the Hornets have had an interest for at least a year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pain662 on Nov 22, 2019 10:31:24 GMT -5
The Hornets are remaking the roster and they’ve gotten themselves pretty well stocked with young guards and wings in the process, plus Washington. But there’s still a glaring hole in the middle and as the Hornets are primed to finally be rid of some of the albatross contracts that have weighed the franchise since its last playoff appearance (in 2016). At long last, they are in position to fill that void.
The target, according to league sources: Pistons big man Andre Drummond, a player in whom the Hornets have had an interest for at least a year. Batum for Drummond |
|
|
|
Post by tadster00 on Nov 22, 2019 16:33:41 GMT -5
This page is awesome, nice work snitches. The key is Jordan today would NOT be the alpha athlete he was in that era. These dudes are bigger, stronger and more coordinated (lol @ Paul George!) he just physically dominated his era. Couldn't do that now. Man it would be cool to see though. Now I think you may just be making stuff up for the sake of it. Jordan wasn't "physically dominant." The only physical part of his game was when he bulked up in the early 90s to combat the Jordan Rules. He only weighed about 210 lbs for most of his career. Plus, the game is SIGNIFICANTLY less physical now than it was then. PFs have gotten heavier and there are a few more point-forwards than their were in yester-year, but most of those guys plant themselves at 24ft and stay out of the middle. It's definitely more of a finesse game today than it used to be. You really think Devin Booker could get 25 per game in 1993? at the worst, MJ has a career like Kobe. And Kobe would still be unstoppable in today's game as he was in his prime. Kawhi plays the most similar offensive style (Kobe and MJ were better at the low block game) while Kawhi shoots the 3 better. I like Show's point about MJ growing up watching AI and a few other stud scorers...he was a killer, he'd still have the killer mentality. That's what separates the great ones. Jordan would be unguardable with today's spacing and lack of hand checks or any aggressive defense unallowed to be played in today's game. MJ was dunking and scoring over 3-4 guys at once on some of his most memorable moments. Plays like that transfer to every generation. |
|
|
|
Post by Pain662 on Nov 22, 2019 18:45:45 GMT -5
Now I think you may just be making stuff up for the sake of it. Jordan wasn't "physically dominant." The only physical part of his game was when he bulked up in the early 90s to combat the Jordan Rules. He only weighed about 210 lbs for most of his career. Plus, the game is SIGNIFICANTLY less physical now than it was then. PFs have gotten heavier and there are a few more point-forwards than their were in yester-year, but most of those guys plant themselves at 24ft and stay out of the middle. It's definitely more of a finesse game today than it used to be. You really think Devin Booker could get 25 per game in 1993? at the worst, MJ has a career like Kobe. And Kobe would still be unstoppable in today's game as he was in his prime. Kawhi plays the most similar offensive style (Kobe and MJ were better at the low block game) while Kawhi shoots the 3 better. I like Show's point about MJ growing up watching AI and a few other stud scorers...he was a killer, he'd still have the killer mentality. That's what separates the great ones. Jordan would be unguardable with today's spacing and lack of hand checks or any aggressive defense unallowed to be played in today's game. MJ was dunking and scoring over 3-4 guys at once on some of his most memorable moments. Plays like that transfer to every generation. This is the point I made the last time this idiocy was brought up. The mentality that MJ and Kobe have would drive them to be the best, no matter the generation. Jordan would flat out feast in today's game. And I'll say again... why is IT2 STILL in the league if MJ couldn't do it? There may not have been 2 three-peats due to the parity but, he would still be a champion and if he had the right guys around him and the right FO, he might have had more chips. |
|
|
|
Post by Pain662 on Nov 22, 2019 18:57:17 GMT -5
Now I think you may just be making stuff up for the sake of it. Jordan wasn't "physically dominant." The only physical part of his game was when he bulked up in the early 90s to combat the Jordan Rules. He only weighed about 210 lbs for most of his career. Plus, the game is SIGNIFICANTLY less physical now than it was then. PFs have gotten heavier and there are a few more point-forwards than their were in yester-year, but most of those guys plant themselves at 24ft and stay out of the middle. It's definitely more of a finesse game today than it used to be. You really think Devin Booker could get 25 per game in 1993? at the worst, MJ has a career like Kobe. And Kobe would still be unstoppable in today's game as he was in his prime. Kawhi plays the most similar offensive style (Kobe and MJ were better at the low block game) while Kawhi shoots the 3 better. I like Show's point about MJ growing up watching AI and a few other stud scorers...he was a killer, he'd still have the killer mentality. That's what separates the great ones. Jordan would be unguardable with today's spacing and lack of hand checks or any aggressive defense unallowed to be played in today's game. MJ was dunking and scoring over 3-4 guys at once on some of his most memorable moments. Plays like that transfer to every generation. MJ was a gym rat. His Ferrari was parked on the street in front of the gym in Upper Wacker every day. We would still be taking about him being the greatest even if he was in this era. That man would not be stopped. |
|
|
|
Post by admiralfish on Nov 22, 2019 20:11:12 GMT -5
This page is awesome, nice work snitches. The key is Jordan today would NOT be the alpha athlete he was in that era. These dudes are bigger, stronger and more coordinated (lol @ Paul George!) he just physically dominated his era. Couldn't do that now. Man it would be cool to see though. Now I think you may just be making stuff up for the sake of it. Jordan wasn't "physically dominant." The only physical part of his game was when he bulked up in the early 90s to combat the Jordan Rules. He only weighed about 210 lbs for most of his career. Plus, the game is SIGNIFICANTLY less physical now than it was then. PFs have gotten heavier and there are a few more point-forwards than their were in yester-year, but most of those guys plant themselves at 24ft and stay out of the middle. It's definitely more of a finesse game today than it used to be. You really think Devin Booker could get 25 per game in 1993? I said he was SIGNIFICANTLY more athletic than his peers. He was the evolution then but there's a ton of guys with that athleticism now. And bigger, stronger faster. He's great in any era but I don't think he would've become THE ONE if he came out later. Mike never won ish by himself or carried lesser teams to the finals. Then, there's this: www.landofbasketball.com/year_by_year_stats/1993_1994_leaders_points_pg_rs.htmHell faking yes I think Devin Booker could drop 25 a night on them dudes are you serious? You guys act like since more contact was allowed them it wouldn't benefit certain guys. Put faking LeBron back there where you're then allowed to bull to the basket and bully on defense WTF?!? IT'S OVER!!! |
|
|
|
Post by mrShowtime on Nov 22, 2019 21:14:01 GMT -5
Now I think you may just be making stuff up for the sake of it. Jordan wasn't "physically dominant." The only physical part of his game was when he bulked up in the early 90s to combat the Jordan Rules. He only weighed about 210 lbs for most of his career. Plus, the game is SIGNIFICANTLY less physical now than it was then. PFs have gotten heavier and there are a few more point-forwards than their were in yester-year, but most of those guys plant themselves at 24ft and stay out of the middle. It's definitely more of a finesse game today than it used to be. You really think Devin Booker could get 25 per game in 1993? I said he was SIGNIFICANTLY more athletic than his peers. He was the evolution then but there's a ton of guys with that athleticism now. And bigger, stronger faster. He's great in any era but I don't think he would've become THE ONE if he came out later. Mike never won ish by himself or carried lesser teams to the finals. Then, there's this: www.landofbasketball.com/year_by_year_stats/1993_1994_leaders_points_pg_rs.htmHell faking yes I think Devin Booker could drop 25 a night on them dudes are you serious? You guys act like since more contact was allowed them it wouldn't benefit certain guys. Put faking LeBron back there where you're then allowed to bull to the basket and bully on defense WTF?!? IT'S OVER!!! Um, there's only two guys in the top 10 on that list who have a game or build remotely near to Booker. Not sure what point you were trying to make (and that's a post-MJ world when the crown was up for grabs). Let's also not say that MJ was playing against plumbers and garbagemen when there were athletic freaks like Nique, Clyde, Mncrief, KJ, JKidd, Kemp, Chuck, Zeke, Worm, LJ, Penny, The Dream, Shaq, Spree, Nance, Grant Hill, The Admiral, Finley, Majerle, Manning, Magic, Alvin Robertson, Reggie Lewis, etc. Also, LeBron alone is NOT representative of the whole league. He's a freak of nature in any generation with an awesome skillset. Just because he exists doesn't mean that every player in the league is at his level. That being said, he doesn't play well when the defender can dictate his moves (see Iggy v LBJ in the Finals). Once you get in his head, he has trouble with contact (i.e. he gets reckless). Many guys made hay in the 90s NBA by having a limited skillset, but being skilled at dictating their defenders' moves. That style died off when these guys were asked to focus less on D and hustle plays and learn to shoot the open three. A 29yr old Dennis Rodman couldn't find a job in today's NBA. |
|
|
|
Post by admiralfish on Nov 22, 2019 21:39:51 GMT -5
I said he was SIGNIFICANTLY more athletic than his peers. He was the evolution then but there's a ton of guys with that athleticism now. And bigger, stronger faster. He's great in any era but I don't think he would've become THE ONE if he came out later. Mike never won ish by himself or carried lesser teams to the finals. Then, there's this: www.landofbasketball.com/year_by_year_stats/1993_1994_leaders_points_pg_rs.htmHell faking yes I think Devin Booker could drop 25 a night on them dudes are you serious? You guys act like since more contact was allowed them it wouldn't benefit certain guys. Put faking LeBron back there where you're then allowed to bull to the basket and bully on defense WTF?!? IT'S OVER!!! Um, there's only two guys in the top 10 on that list who have a game or build remotely near to Booker. Not sure what point you were trying to make (and that's a post-MJ world when the crown was up for grabs). Let's also not say that MJ was playing against plumbers and garbagemen when there were athletic freaks like Nique, Clyde, Mncrief, KJ, JKidd, Kemp, Chuck, Zeke, Worm, LJ, Penny, The Dream, Shaq, Spree, Nance, Grant Hill, The Admiral, Finley, Majerle, Manning, Magic, Alvin Robertson, Reggie Lewis, etc. Also, LeBron alone is NOT representative of the whole league. He's a freak of nature in any generation with an awesome skillset. Just because he exists doesn't mean that every player in the league is at his level. That being said, he doesn't play well when the defender can dictate his moves (see Iggy v LBJ in the Finals). Once you get in his head, he has trouble with contact (i.e. he gets reckless). Many guys made hay in the 90s NBA by having a limited skillset, but being skilled at dictating their defenders' moves. That style died off when these guys were asked to focus less on D and hustle plays and learn to shoot the open three. A 29yr old Dennis Rodman couldn't find a job in today's NBA. Dude, get over your nostalgia! Devin Booker would SERVE thunder Dan WTF are you talking about?!? And a 29 year old rodman who in this modern NBA would be all defensive at all 5 positions with tons of offensive skill he just didn't use to appease the teams scorers wouldn't have a place in the NBA?!? I'm Sooooo faking DONE with this conversation!!! Pass the weed cookies man you bugging out! |
|
